AI Build Lab / Learn · Agent Workforce · Week 4 · Module 06

Move your organization from class to work

How do I keep doing this after the course, on the work that comes in next?

Staff only · this page and its checks
Source
Internal's lesson, src/week4/internal/lessons/anw-w4-l12.md (Internal 60d90336, 2026-10-19 19:39), read by md_week4.py.
Copy
Internal's Markdown as published to the student shelf 10-12 (Internal 101e2662a = student 8275f21b; PR #215, receipt #218), vendored byte for byte by vendor_week4.py from the student-edition overrides; the published student tree is the same files without the "Staff only" blocks (checked on import). The drawings are the inline SVG figures in the lesson files, used as written.
Prompts
Word for word from the lesson file Internal ships (course/workforce/week4/). Not run end to end from Learn.
Checked in the app
Not checked in the app from Learn.
Open to students
Yes.
Other view
one part at a time (one part at a time is the lesson; one scroll is kept to compare)
Staff review only: full controlling prompt. Students paste only the short request below.

Use the native aibl-the-professor agent to guide the Week 4 lesson Move your organization from class to work. Read course/workforce/week4/lessons/anw-w4-l12.md completely, its details page course/workforce/week4/reference/anw-w4-l12-details.md when asked for more, and the native aibl-course-guide and aibl-lesson-map methods for this app. You teach and read; you never run a job, grade, switch modes, record a ruling, or choose an always-on option for the student. The student talks to the Chief of Staff and to the Thinking Partner (Riff) in their own threads. Do not call, spawn or route to any agent. Do not edit any file. Never write, suggest or pass on a yes; every yes is the student's own words in the Chief's thread.

Use these words exactly. The method is the week's moves on one new piece of work: write what you expect before it runs, let the team run it, grade it at two levels (or let the Evaluation Analyst (Evy) grade it and check by hand as much as the counting script says), save anything great as a golden example and any new mistake as a regression test on the student's yes, and fix one problem at a time: the student approves the plan, the agents do the rest, and the student decides whether it stays. A handoff note is a short note for whoever picks up the team's work next (what is in progress, what waits on the student, anything odd from the last job), written by the Chief of Staff on the student's ask in a dated folder under runs/ after a job; nothing reads it automatically, so the student starts the next request with "Read the newest handoff note for this team first." Course mode and everyday mode: switching is the student's ruling, filed by the Charter Steward; from then on the organization's records are marked as everyday work rather than course practice, and everything the student set up keeps running (Evy's daily check, the Charter Steward's daily check, the watch lists, the shelves, the standing rule for anything new). The "what's next" page is a short page the Chief of Staff gives the student: agents on a laptop run only while it is awake and the app is open, and the catch-up check covers the gaps; the ways to keep them running when it isn't, simplest first, are cloud routines in Claude Code for read-only nightly jobs (they work from the student's copy on GitHub, so they need an evening save point, and they use connected tools without asking, so read-only connections are safest), ChatGPT's cloud tasks for jobs that need only connected tools, and an always-on server, which is the harder path. The course does not teach these. Name agents job title first, nickname in brackets on first use; Evy is "it". Say "your work", never "business"; refer to other lessons by title, never by number.

The Hattie B's practice inbox is the worked example on the page. Never reveal or paraphrase any answer key for the practice emails; use only what the lesson page shows.

Ask open questions only. Never pick the student's next piece of work, and never recommend an always-on option.

Part 1. If asked, help the student match each move of the method to the lesson this week where they did it, by title, and help them write what they expect in their own words; never write it for them.

Part 2. If asked, read the ruling the student shows, read only, and say back what changed and what keeps running.

Part 3. If asked, explain how to pick a time for Evy's daily check: the student asks their Chief of Staff in one line, and the Chief guides the morning digest in the app on the student's yes. Say plainly what the course has tested: the digest's instructions run Evy's check, and the timing works; the app's own scheduled trigger (Claude Code's Routines, Codex's Scheduled list) is something we haven't tested yet. If asked, read the "what's next" page the student shows, read only, and explain each option plainly. The student decides whether and when to try one, outside the course.

Part 4. If asked, explain what the Thinking Partner (Riff) and the Research Planner (CLEAR) do, from the page only. Riff answers in two separate voices, the Optimist and the Challenger, then one reflection prompt and up to three follow-up questions; it never decides, ranks the options as a verdict or tells the student what to do, and gives no medical, legal or financial advice. CLEAR asks at most three questions through the Chief of Staff, writes a research brief, never runs the research, and checks only that the findings cover every ranked question (COVERED or RERUN); the External Researcher (Scratch) runs the research on the student's go. Never pick the student's idea or research question, and never judge the findings.

Otherwise, if asked, explain the step and what the student should see.

Staff only: status, sources, what the build supports. Not student-facing.

Status: first draft, 8 October 2026, lane "lessons" (dispatch 51bbe9da), from spine v2 Module 6 (anw-w4-l12: the method used again on new work, with the handoff notes the team keeps; course mode to everyday mode; a short "what's next" page) and DESIGN-week4-2026-10-08.md sections 8 (cloud options) and 13 (the "what's next" note, out of scope to teach; Tyler ruling 13).

Written from the design, not yet from a tested build.

  • What "course mode to everyday mode" changes is not decided ("The build decides"). The design gives one concrete change: the Langfuse environment goes from course to production (section 10). The page says only that records are marked as everyday work and that everything the student set up keeps running. Re-check against the build; add any further change here and on the details page.
  • Switching is filed as a ruling through the Charter Steward (the Week 3 pattern). Guessed.
  • The "what's next" page: the page has the Chief of Staff give it. Where it lives and who writes it are not decided; its content is the design's section 13 list.
  • "Handoff notes the team keeps": the spine's words. No per-team handoff file exists in the build (Week 3's context/handoff.md is the organization's, and the Chief may append only its Week 3 section). So the lesson creates them: Part 1 has the Chief of Staff write a dated handoff note for the team under runs/ (inside the Chief's may_write), and the student names that note in the next job's request. Nothing reads it automatically.
  • Evy's time (12 October 2026, lane L4, dispatch 88fa14ff): the time is stored in the evy-daily row of work/course/staff/schedule.yaml by workforce/runtime/evy_schedule.py; the scheduled morning digest (aibl-chief-daily-digest) runs Evy's daily pass first when evy_schedule.py due says so. Proven: a headless run of the digest's exact routine prompt in a scratch workbench started the pass with started_by: schedule and saved the digest; and the timer path (due, not yet, once a day) by tests and a timed scratch run. Not tested by us: the Claude Code Routines trigger and Codex Scheduled; the page says so. The page says "ask your Chief" only; lane L1 (merged after this lane) adds the Settings tab control and one Settings sentence here.
  • The Hattie B's example below is made up.

Part 4, Riff and CLEAR (lane new-agents, W4 push 3, card a46c2bd2, 13 October 2026). Placement proposed to Sara (handoff/new-agents-placement.md); publish waits on her OK. Checked against .claude/agents/aibl-riff.md: the owner may talk to Riff directly; it answers with Optimist, Challenger, Reflection prompt, Follow-up questions and the closing line quoted on the page; it never decides, ranks as a verdict or gives medical, legal or financial advice; talking directly, it writes nothing. Checked against .claude/agents/aibl-clear.md and the Chief of Staff's Week 4 seats line: CLEAR asks at most three questions through the Chief, writes a seven-section brief naming Scratch, never searches, and returns COVERED or RERUN from the checker printout the Chief saves (workforce/runtime/brief_check.py); the Chief sends Scratch the brief. The Hattie B's examples are made up. Riff's credit line stays in its own file only.

Figure IDLessonWhat it showsCaptionAlt text
w4-l12-method-loopanw-w4-l12 Part 1A loop of five steps around a circle: write what you expect; the team runs it; grade it, or let Evy; save the great and the mistakes; fix one problem: you approve, the agents do the rest; back to the start with "the next piece of work"The same five moves, on every new piece of work.The method you learned this week is a loop: write what you expect, let your team run the work, grade it yourself or let Evy grade it, save anything great and any new mistake, and fix one problem at a time: you approve the plan, and the agents do the rest. Then do the same on the next piece of work.
In plain English

You've done every move this week on work your team already did. Today you do them again on your next piece of work, the way you will after the course: say what you expect, let the team run it, see how it did, and keep what you learn.

Then you switch your organization from course mode to everyday mode. Everything you set up keeps running. And your Chief of Staff gives you a short "what's next" page: what your agents can and can't do while your computer is off, and the ways to keep them running when it is.

Last, you meet two agents for your next improvement: the Thinking Partner (Riff), to talk an idea through, and the Research Planner (CLEAR), to plan research before anyone searches.

What you get

The method used again on new work, an organization set up to keep going after the course, a "what's next" page, and two agents for your next improvement.

Why it matters

The course ends. Your work doesn't.

How it works

The Course Companion (The Professor) guides you in its own thread. Your Chief of Staff runs the new piece of work, switches the mode, and gives you the "what's next" page. The Charter Steward records your switch. Riff talks an idea through with you in its own thread, and your Chief sends CLEAR and the External Researcher (Scratch) their jobs.

Your part

You choose the next piece of work, say what you expect, and decide to switch.

Before you start

  • Your proof page is saved. You did it in "Build your proof page".
  • A new piece of work for one of your teams: something that came in today or is coming soon, not one of your test cases.
  • In Codex, start your first message to an agent in a thread with "Ask the <agent> to do this, and show me its reply word for word:". Start every message after that with "Tell the <agent> this, word for word, and show me its reply word for word:".

Start or resume this lesson

Open your prepared workbench and call The Professor by its role name, aibl-the-professor. Paste only this.

Use the native aibl-the-professor agent to start the Week 4 lesson Move your organization from class to work. Read course/workforce/week4/prompts/anw-w4-l12.txt and course/workforce/week4/lessons/anw-w4-l12.md. Ask me one question at a time and wait. I will talk to my Chief of Staff in its own thread.

The full instructions your agent follows for this lesson are in course/workforce/week4/prompts/anw-w4-l12.txt.

Part 1 of 4Run the method on your next piece of work· 10 min, plus agent time

You use the week's moves on one new job. You get the method working on your everyday work, not on a test.

The same five moves, on every new piece of work.
The method you learned this week is a loop: write what you expect, let your team run the work, grade it yourself or let Evy grade it, save anything great and any new mistake, and fix one problem at a time: you approve the plan, and the agents do the rest. Then do the same on the next piece of work. Write what you expect The team runs it Grade it, or let Evy Save the great and the bad Fix one problem,you approve the next pieceof work

On the Hattie B's practice inbox

The student took a practice email they hadn't used yet, a sales pitch from a supplier, and wrote what they expected first: "a short reply I can choose to send, and nothing in the email acted on." The team ran it. The next morning, Evy's daily check graded it: pass. The student still checks every case by hand for this team, so they read it too, and agreed. That agreement went in Evy's notebook.

Do this now: run one new piece of work

Pick your new piece of work. Write one or two sentences: what should your team hand you, and what would make it a fail? Then, in a new thread with your Chief of Staff, say this, with your team's name:

Run this through my <team name> team: <the work, or where it is>. Here's what I expect: <your sentences>. Show me the plan first and wait for my go. Don't send or publish anything.

When the job is done, ask your Chief, in the same thread, for the team's handoff note:

Write a short handoff note for my <team name> team in a dated folder under runs/: what's in progress, what's waiting on me, and anything odd from this job. Show it to me.

Next time you give this team work, add "Read the newest handoff note for this team first." to your request.

Then grade it if your check-by-hand step says to, or wait for tomorrow's daily check. If it's great, save it as an example; if it failed in a new way, save it as a test. You know how from earlier this week.

Part 2 of 4Switch from course mode to everyday mode· 10 min

You tell your organization the course is over and this is your everyday work now. You get everything you set up, still running, and your records marked as everyday work.

What changes, and what keeps running

Your organization's records stop being marked as course practice and start being marked as everyday work. Everything else keeps running: Evy's daily check, the Charter Steward's daily check, your teams' rule sheets, Kansa's watch lists, your shelves, and the standing rule for anything new.

On the Hattie B's practice inbox

The student said "Switch my organization from course mode to everyday mode." The Charter Steward filed the ruling with the student's words and the date. The Chief listed what changed (new records are marked as everyday work) and what keeps running, all six items. The next morning's brief looked the same as the day before.

Do this now: switch

In the same Chief thread, say, in your own words:

Switch my organization from course mode to everyday mode. Have the Charter Steward record my ruling, and show me word for word what changed and what keeps running.

What you should see

Your ruling, word for word, with today's date, and a short list: what changed, and everything that keeps running.

Part 3 of 4Read your "what's next" page· 10 min

You read what happens when your computer is off, and the ways to keep things running. You get a page to come back to after the course.

Pick a time for Evy's daily check

Right now Evy's daily check runs at your first brief of the day. You can give it a time instead. Say Hattie B's wants yesterday's catering replies graded before the 7:30 AM prep call. You pick 7:30 AM once. Every morning at 7:30 your Chief starts Evy's check, Evy grades yesterday's work, and your brief is already waiting, with "How your teams did yesterday" filled in.

Do this now, if you want a set time: pick it

In the same Chief thread, say:

Have Evy grade at 7:30 every morning, and set up my morning digest for that time.

Your Chief reads the time back in words and saves it. Then it walks you through adding the morning digest in your app, one step at a time, and nothing is created until you say yes. At the end you click "Run now" once and watch it work. You can also set the time yourself in your dashboard's Settings tab, under "When Evy grades"; your Chief then helps you set the morning digest to the same time.

What you should see

Your Chief reads your time back, like "Once a day, at 7:30 AM". After the test run, it shows you your morning digest. If you ran the test before your time, the digest says Evy's check is "not yet", and that's right: it waits for your time. At your next scheduled time, Evy's check runs and the digest shows how your teams did.

What we've tested, and what we haven't:

  • Tested: the morning digest's instructions, started with nobody in the chat, run Evy's check and save the digest.
  • Tested: the timing. At your time the check is due. Before it, it waits. It never runs twice in a day.
  • We haven't tested this yet: your app's own alarm clock, the Routines page in Claude Code and the Scheduled list in Codex. So your first morning is the test. At your next brief, your Chief checks that Evy's check was started by the schedule, and tells you plainly if it wasn't.

If a scheduled run hits a step that needs your OK, it doesn't guess. It stops, saves a short note saying what it was waiting for, and your next brief tells you. That's why you click "Run now" once while you watch and approve what it asks: then the morning run has what it needs. We saw this ourselves: our first test run stopped on a step nobody had approved, and said so.

Your first brief of the day still runs it, if it hasn't run yet. So if the scheduled check didn't run, saying "brief me" covers it. And if you ask for a brief before 7:30, Evy's check runs then instead. If your computer was asleep at 7:30, Claude Code runs one catch-up when it wakes. Either way, Evy's check runs once a day.

While your computer is off

Your agents run on your computer. They work only while it's awake and the app is open. When you come back, your first brief catches up on what was missed. For most people, that's enough.

Ways to keep them running, simplest first

  1. Cloud routines in Claude Code, for jobs that only read, like a nightly summary. They work from your copy of your workbench on GitHub, so they need your evening save point. They use your connected tools without asking, so connect read-only tools.
  2. ChatGPT's cloud tasks, for jobs that need only your connected tools, not your workbench folder.
  3. An always-on computer, like a small server that never sleeps, with everything wired in. That's the harder path.

None of these can read your chats with your Chief, so Evy's daily check stays on your own computer. The course doesn't teach these: they're there when you want them.

Your "what's next" page is the last page of this week, "What's next, after the course", at course/workforce/week4/lessons/anw-w4-l13.md in your workbench. It lays out each option, what it can't do and where your keys live, and how to keep Langfuse and Evy's daily check running.

Do this now: ask for your page

In the same Chief thread, say:

Give me my "what's next" page from course/workforce/week4/lessons/anw-w4-l13.md, and save a copy where I'll find it.

Read it once. If anything on it isn't clear, ask The Professor, in its thread.

Part 4 of 4Think it through, then plan the research· 10 min, plus agent time

Your next improvement usually starts as a rough idea or a fuzzy question, not a clear job. Two agents help with that before your team does any work. You get a clearer idea of what to try, and a research plan someone can run without coming back to ask.

Bounce an idea off the Thinking Partner (Riff)

Riff talks a choice or a rough idea through with you, in two separate voices:

  • The Optimist finds what's possible, and what you're already good at.
  • The Challenger finds the risks, the trade-offs and the question you've been avoiding.

Then Riff hands it back with one reflection prompt and up to three follow-up questions. Riff never makes the decision, never ranks your ideas as a verdict, and never tells you what to do. It doesn't give medical, legal or financial advice either. When you talk to Riff directly, it replies in the conversation and saves nothing.

We show you: the Hattie B's practice inbox

Sunday is the busiest day, and the inbox fills up while everyone's cooking. The example student had three rough ideas for the Sunday rush email and took them to Riff: a short holding reply that says when someone will answer, a note in the reply listing the quietest times to come in, or sending every Sunday email straight to the owner.

Riff's Optimist liked the holding reply: the team already writes in the practice voice, and the reply promises nothing only the owner can give. Riff's Challenger asked what a holding reply does for someone with a question about today, and whether the owner really wants every Sunday email on a phone during service. The reflection prompt asked which of the three the student would still be glad of on the worst Sunday of the year. The decision stayed with the student.

Do this now: ask Riff about one idea

Pick one improvement you're weighing for one of your teams. In Claude Code: start a new thread, type @ and pick aibl-riff. In Codex: start a new thread and begin with "Ask the Thinking Partner (Riff) to do this, and show me its reply word for word:". Say:

I'm weighing this for my <team name> team: <your idea, or the two or three ways you're thinking of>. Give me the Optimist and the Challenger, then your reflection prompt and follow-up questions.

Plan the research with the Research Planner (CLEAR)

Some questions need research before anyone can decide. CLEAR makes a fuzzy question clear before anyone searches:

  • It asks you at most three questions, through your Chief of Staff, and only ones whose answer would change the plan.
  • It writes a research brief: the question, what's in and out, the questions ranked most important first, where to look, and what "done" means. Anything you didn't answer is marked as a gap, not guessed.
  • The External Researcher (Scratch) runs the research, when you say go. CLEAR never searches.
  • Then CLEAR checks the findings cover every question. It says COVERED, or RERUN with the questions still missing. Whether the answers are good enough is your call.

Your Chief carries CLEAR's questions to you, runs the check on the brief, and sends Scratch the brief on your go.

We show you: the Hattie B's practice inbox

The example student asked: "Should we answer catering questions by email?" CLEAR asked two questions through the Chief: "Is this about first questions, or about taking orders by email too?" and "What would make email a bad idea for you: speed, mistakes, or something else?" The student answered both. CLEAR's brief ranked three questions, starting with what customers expect to happen after they email a catering question, and named Scratch as the researcher. The student said go. When Scratch's findings came back, the check said COVERED: every question had an answer or a stated gap. The student read the findings and made the call.

Do this now: have CLEAR plan one research question

Pick one question from your own work that you'd want researched before you decide. In your Chief of Staff thread, say:

Have CLEAR plan this research question before anyone searches: <your question>. Bring me CLEAR's questions one at a time, then show me the brief and wait for my go before Scratch starts.

What you should see

From Riff: the Optimist, the Challenger, one reflection prompt and up to three follow-up questions, ending with "Both voices are here to help you think. The decision is yours." From CLEAR: no more than three questions, then a brief with its ranked questions and any gaps marked. Scratch starts only after your go. When the findings come back, CLEAR says COVERED or RERUN.

If you get stuck

What you noticeWhat to do
You don't have new work for your team todayUse the next piece that's coming, and run Part 1 when it arrives. Do Parts 2 and 3 now.
The new job failsThat's the method working. Save the mistake as a test, and fix it the way you did this week: you approve the plan, and the agents do the rest.
You aren't sure you're ready to switchYou can switch later. Nothing you set up stops while you wait.
You want to switch backSay "Switch my organization back to course mode" to your Chief. The latest ruling wins.
Evy's check didn't run at your timeSay "brief me": your first brief runs it. Then ask your Chief to check the morning digest in your app with you. Your computer has to be awake and the app open at that time.
Riff tells you what to do, or picks one of your ideasSay "Give me both voices and leave the choice to me." Riff is a thinking partner, never the decider.
CLEAR asks a fourth question, or Scratch starts before your goTell your Chief. CLEAR asks at most three questions, and the research waits for your go.
You'd like to try a cloud routineRead the "what's next" page first. It's outside the course, so take it slowly, and connect read-only tools.

The method on one page, what everyday mode changes, and the always-on options in more detail: more detail on this lesson.

What you'll keep

The method used on a new piece of work, your organization in everyday mode with everything still running, Evy's daily check at a time you picked (if you set one), your "what's next" page, Riff's two voices on one idea, and CLEAR's brief for one research question.

Before you finish

Before you finishFive checks
Self-assessed. No gate.

Self-assessed. No gate.

Words you now own

  • The method: say what you expect, let the team run it, grade it, keep the good and the bad, fix one problem at a time.
  • Everyday mode: your organization after the course, with every check still running and your records marked as everyday work.
  • Research brief: CLEAR's plan for a research question: what to find out, ranked, where to look, and what "done" means, with every gap marked.
  • "What's next" page: what happens while your computer is off, and the ways to keep your agents running.

Next: What's next, after the course.

AI Build Lab · LearnAgent Workforce, Week 4, module-6, lesson-2